January 27, 2025

What I’m Hearing: A Michael Jackson Shocker, Oscar Stakes & Netflix’s Blowout – Puck

A new economic model in which writers are also partners in the business.Customize your settings to receive the newsletters you want from the authors you follow.Connect directly with Puck talent through email and exclusive events.   Welcome back to What I’m Hearing, coming from L.A. and
not Sundance tonight. Too much going on at home this year, though I’ll admit festival head Eugene Hernandez’s Instagram and the appearance of producer Jamie Patricof’s annual Park City restaurant list gave me a little FOMO. The Utah weather report,
however, resolved those concerns pretty quickly.     Tonight, I’ve got a crazy twist in the saga of the big-budget Michael Jackson movie, and its producer’s quest to resolve a major problem that threatens to derail the entire production. Plus some thoughts on the Oscar noms, Netflix’s Beast Mode earnings report, and the most frightening agent in Hollywood.    
 Still not a Puck member? Click here. Got a news tip or a column idea? Reply to this email or message me on Signal at 310-804-3198. Let’s begin…Now, on to the MJ movie madness…The late pop star’s estate overlooked a key
contract with a child accuser that has now rendered the already shot third act of the film unusable. With the clock ticking on a delayed October release date, producers are scrambling to rewrite, reshoot, and somehow salvage MJ’s big-budget musical biopic.It’s the nightmare scenario for movie producers, right? You
spend years assembling your project, convincing an Oscar-nominated screenwriter to tackle difficult material. You secure the necessary I.P. rights and the massive, $150 million budget to tell the story right. You get distributors on board—both foreign and domestic—and a starry cast whose schedules barely align. You spend months shooting the entire movie, mostly on location at the exact sites you envisioned (some of which you had to beg to secure). Then, as you’re starting
postproduction, with your director cutting it all together to meet your aggressive release date, the phone rings, and everything begins to fall apart. That’s basically what just happened to Graham King, the lead producer of Michael, the big-budget Michael Jackson movie directed by Antoine Fuqua (Training Day), written by John
Logan (Gladiator), and starring Miles Teller, Colman Domingo, Nia Long, and Jackson’s nephew Jaafar Jackson as the King of Pop himself. Lionsgate, which is distributing Michael in the U.S., announced in November that the film was being delayed from April until at least October. What the studio didn’t say was why—and man, the real story here is a wild one. First, if you recall, I wrote about this movie last April. Someone slipped me the script, and as I read it, I was surprised by how aggressively the project sought to change the narrative on Jackson’s, uh, complicated legacy. Michael’s famously protective estate and its executors, John Branca and
John McClain, are involved in this movie, so I knew it wasn’t exactly gonna be a no-holds-barred exploration of the pedophilia allegations that first arose in the ’90s. (Jackson and his estate have always denied the claims, and he was prosecuted in 2005 but never convicted of any crimes.)A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR13 Academy Awards® Nominations includingBEST
PICTURETHE MOST NOMINATED FILM OF THE YEAR — PGA Award NomineeDarryl F. Zanuck For Outstanding ProducerOf Theatrical Motion Pictures_______From DGA Award
Nominated DirectorJacques Audiard [WATCH] An Inside Look At The Making of EMILIA PÉREZDiscover the making of the film with an in-depth look at the story, the cast, and the music and extraordinary crafts
that bring EMILIA PÉREZ to life.  “It’s just not like any other film
that’s ever been made.It’s bold, daring, a vision.”–James Cameron — EXPLORE THE
ORIGINAL WORLD OF EMILIA PÉREZ[CLICK HERE]_______ For more information on EMILIA PÉREZ, visit
film.netflixawards.com But this movie is different from other Jackson-related media
that has appeared in the years since his 2009 death, at age 50, from a drug overdose. While the estate-approved Cirque du Soleil shows and the hit Broadway musical, MJ, all but ignore the child accusers and focus on Jackson’s public persona and his incredible music, this movie addresses them head-on. Michael, as I wrote, “directly engages with the allegations against Jackson. And it not only engages, it wants very much to convince you Michael is innocent.” That engagement has turned out to be a major problem for everyone involved. Here’s why: The script begins and ends during the 1993 investigation into statements about Jackson’s anatomy made by Jordan Chandler, the then-13-year-old boy whose molestation claim led to worldwide headlines and an eventual $20 million settlement. The script depicts Jackson as the naïve victim of the money-grubbing
Chandlers, whose unfounded claims force Jackson to endure ridicule and persecution until he ultimately settles, his resolve and reputation forever in tatters. The film’s third act, in particular, hinges specifically on the impact of the Chandler circus. In the script I read—which I’m told was close to final, but obviously these things are often revised—a tense sequence involves Branca (Teller),
Johnnie Cochran (Derek Luke), and other Jackson lawyers discussing whether to pay off Chandler and his family. At one point, the lawyers play the infamous recording, submitted in court, of Jordan’s father threatening to leverage his son’s accusations to “destroy” his ex-wife and Jackson’s career. The ensuing scenes dramatize the extensive police investigation, including a “traumatizing” strip search of Michael that scars him for life. The problem? Years before signing off on the Michael movie with the Chandlers featured in the script, Jackson’s team agreed they would never include the family in any such movie. Yes, according to two sources, there’s a signed agreement with the Chandlers prohibiting any dramatization of them or their stories. Ouch. That deal, which was overlooked by the estate during the vetting of the script, has now rendered the
planned storyline and several key scenes that were shot unusable. Like I said, a nightmare. (Several attempts to reach Branca and the Jackson estate’s lead litigator, Jonathan Steinsapir, were unsuccessful.)How in the name of Bubbles the Chimp did this happen? After all,
per three sources involved with the project, Branca assured King and the filmmakers that there was nothing to worry about, no skeletons in Michael’s closet that weren’t already known, and no surprises that would put the film or its narrative in jeopardy. It is well known that Branca was in and out of Jackson’s life in the late ’80s and early ’90s, returning right around the time of the Chandler situation. So it would have made sense that Cochran, the late litigator, and not Branca,
would have handled the settlement with the family. But still, Branca is the co-executor of an estate worth billions, so the buck stops with him.  The catalyst for all this was a September story in the Financial Times that revealed Branca had made secret hush money
payments to five accusers who had come forward after HBO aired the 2019 documentary Leaving Neverland, which focused on accusers Wade Robson and James Safechuck. According to the FT, these new accusers threatened to go public with claims that Jackson had acted inappropriately, and the estate agreed to collectively pay them $16.5 million to stay quiet. Then last year, as the payments neared their end, one of the five accusers allegedly violated
the agreement, seeking an additional $213 million, so the estate brought an arbitration claim against him. When the FT found out about the payments, so did the Michael filmmakers and their studio partners, who didn’t love being blindsided. What else has the estate not revealed? Everyone involved knows this movie will have a giant target on it when it’s released. Michael
Jackson has always been a magnet for crazy people and litigious crazy people. Everything about Michael needs to be airtight, and the filmmakers feared that any “noise” around Jackson from new accusers could damage the film’s reception. The estate is already battling in court against Robson and Safechuck, although a planned trial early this year has been delayed until 2026.  But that was just the
beginning. According to two sources, around the time he revealed the hush money payments, Branca let the filmmakers know that there was a legal issue with the third act of the movie. That’s when everyone learned about the decades-old deal with the Chandlers. Mind you, this was after shooting had wrapped on a film with a $150 million budget. It was after King had teased footage of the movie at CinemaCon last April, and Fuqua had gone to ComicCon in July to tell everyone how
great it was turning out. I can only imagine how the famously emotional King reacted. If Michael now can’t “dramatize” the Chandler claims, which are the backbone of the film, what, exactly, will the third act entail?   A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR13 Academy Awards® Nominations includingBEST
PICTURETHE MOST NOMINATED FILM OF THE YEAR — PGA Award NomineeDarryl F. Zanuck For Outstanding ProducerOf Theatrical Motion Pictures_______From DGA Award
Nominated DirectorJacques Audiard [WATCH] An Inside Look At The Making of EMILIA PÉREZDiscover the making of the film with an in-depth look at the story, the cast, and the music and extraordinary crafts
that bring EMILIA PÉREZ to life.  “It’s just not like any other film
that’s ever been made.It’s bold, daring, a vision.”–James Cameron — EXPLORE THE
ORIGINAL WORLD OF EMILIA PÉREZ[CLICK HERE]_______ For more information on EMILIA PÉREZ, visit
film.netflixawards.com That’s what King, Fuqua, and Logan have been trying to figure
out for weeks now. After a rewrite, the filmmakers are set to give Lionsgate a revised script and shooting strategy for approval as early as this week. Universal, which is distributing overseas, must also sign off on the changes—or bail on the project entirely, if the studio chooses. (Both Lionsgate and Universal declined to comment.) Even before this problem emerged, the estate had agreed to fund any reshoots; it will now cover the costs of the additional photography necessary to complete a
new, legally kosher version of the film. A huge expense, of course, but remember, thanks to Branca, the estate has generated an estimated $3 billion in revenue since Jackson died, including last year’s massive $600 million sale of half of Jackson’s music catalog to Sony.  King, who declined to talk to me, is said to be confident that his team can fix the movie. He’s booked soundstages for March and informed key cast and crew of the need to
reconvene. A source at Lionsgate is similarly hopeful that King can resolve the issues in time to hit that October release date. (Universal has a jam-packed 2026 slate, so there aren’t many dates to put Michael if further delays are needed.)    The good news, according to everyone I spoke with, is that the usable footage they do have is impressive. Jackson’s nephew delivers as Michael, and
the musical sequences play big, like something you’d want to watch in Imax. Time after time, Jackson’s millions of fans have chosen to celebrate his music and larger-than-life persona—and ignore the allegations that consumed the final third of his life. So I’m betting Michael, if it ultimately pleases the fans, will be a global hit in the vein of King’s Bohemian Rhapsody, and nobody in the real world will care about any of these extraordinary behind-the-scenes problems. That
is, of course, if the movie is actually released. Last week on The Town, Warner Bailey,
proprietor of the popular Assistants vs. Agents account on Instagram, revealed a new “awards show” for agents featuring the results of a poll of his 1,700 or so followers. Bailey has now closed the voting, and I’m pleased to present a few of the official results: Most Frightening Agent:Nicest Agent:Agent With the Best Style:Hardest to Get on the Phone: Poach of the Year (POTY):See you Monday,Matt Got a question, comment, complaint, or want to donate to L.A. fire relief? Go here, or email me at
[email protected] or call/text me at 310-804-3198.Puck founding partner Matt Belloni takes you inside the business of Hollywood, using exclusive reporting and
insight to explain the backstories on everything from Marvel movies to the streaming wars.A professional-grade rundown on the business of sports from John Ourand, the industry’s preeminent journalist,
covering the leagues, players, agencies, media deals, and the egos fueling it all.Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email [email protected].
You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with . To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click
here.Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006SEE THE ARCHIVES
Sign up today to join the inside conversation at the nexus of Wall Street, Washington, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and more.

Already a member? Log In

Exclusive to Inner Circle only

Enter your email for a free preview of Puck’s full offering, including exclusive articles, private emails from authors, and more.

Verify your email and sign in by clicking the link we just sent.

Already a member? Log In

Start 14 Day Free Trial for Unlimited Access Instead →

You have 1 free article Left

To read this full story and more,
start your 14 day free trial today

Already a member? Log In

Already a member? Log In

Use Email & Password Instead

Use Another Sign-Up Method

All of the insider knowledge from our top tier authors, in your inbox.
Already a member? Log In

You should receive a link to log in at .

I DID NOT RECEIVE A LINK

Didn’t get an email? Check your spam folder and confirm the spelling of your email, and try again. If you continue to have trouble, reach out to [email protected].

Not a member yet? Sign up today

You should receive a link to log in at .

I DID NOT RECEIVE A LINK

Didn’t get an email? Check your spam folder and confirm the spelling of your email, and try again. If you continue to have trouble, reach out to [email protected].

Use a different sign in option instead

Member Exclusive

Create a free account to preview Puck’s full offering, including exclusive articles, private emails from authors, and more.

Already a member? Sign in

You are logged into a free account as

[email protected]

ENJOY 1 FREE ARTICLE EACH MONTH

Subscribe today to join the inside conversation at the nexus of Wall Street, Washington, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and more.

Source: https://puck.news/newsletter_content/what-im-hearing-a-michael-jackson-shocker-oscar-stakes-netflixs-blowout-3/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.