Microsoft rolls back its Bing Image Creator model after users complain of degraded quality – TechCrunch
Latest
AI
Amazon
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Newsletters
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Ahead of the holidays, Microsoft said it was upgrading the AI model behind Bing Image Creator, the AI-powered image editing tool built into the company’s Bing search engine. Microsoft promised that the new model — the latest version of OpenAI’s DALL-E 3 model, code-named PR16 — would allow users to create images “twice as fast as before” with “higher quality.”But it didn’t deliver. Complaints quickly flooded X and Reddit.“The DALL-E we used to love is gone forever,” said one Redditor. “I’m using ChatGPT now because Bing has become useless for me,” wrote another.The blowback was such that Microsoft said it’ll restore the previous model to Bing Image Creator until it can address the issues. bring back the old dalle 3! the image quality is so much better on the old model. like these images for example. the image generated by the new model sucks 🙁 pic.twitter.com/BjIM8MS4ng— ze ᡣ𐭩ྀིྀི (@riegrowl) December 28, 2024 “We’ve been able to [reproduce] some of the issues reported, and plan to revert to [DALL-E 3] PR13 until we can fix them,” Jordi Ribas, head of search at Microsoft, said in a post on X Tuesday evening. “The deployment process is very slow unfortunately. It started over a week ago and will take 2-3 more weeks to get to 100%.”So what went wrong? It’s difficult to compare model outputs from anecdotal reports, particularly when the prompts aren’t standardized. But many users said that PR16 tended to make images look less realistic. Mayank Parmar, writing for Windows Latest, noted that PR16-generated images lacked detail and polish, and appeared weirdly cartoonish and “lifeless.”I don’t know who you think you’re kidding with this. DALL-E is objectively worse than it ever was after this “update” and you’re being outpaced by other companies like Google. It’s absolutely night and day comparing image quality now to just a couple months ago pic.twitter.com/EdSdk7aign— outward (@roccynoxy) December 19, 2024 It’s not the first time an image model that presumably passed internal checks wasn’t well-received publicly. Back in February, Google was forced to pause its AI chatbot Gemini’s ability to create images of people after users complained of historical inaccuracies.The missteps illustrate just how challenging it can be to measure model improvements in the real world. According to Ribas, Microsoft’s benchmarking found PR16’s quality to be “a bit better on average” compared to the previous Bing Image Creator model.Whatever internal metric the company used, it seems clear that it didn’t align with most people’s preferences.TechCrunch has an AI-focused newsletter! Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Wednesday.Topics
Senior Reporter, Enterprise
Elon Musk agrees that we’ve exhausted AI training data
CES 2025 was full of IRL AI slop
Halliday’s $489 smart glasses beam a tiny screen to your eye
Mastodon CEO calls Meta’s moderation changes ‘deeply troubling,’ warns users cross-posting from Threads
Gamers can’t fathom how 6x CEO Elon Musk found time to best Diablo IV
Ukrainian hackers take credit for hacking Russian ISP that wiped out servers and caused internet outages
Edtech giant PowerSchool says hackers accessed personal data of students and teachers
Subscribe for the industry’s biggest tech newsEvery weekday and Sunday, you can get the best of TechCrunch’s coverage.TechCrunch’s AI experts cover the latest news in the fast-moving field.Every Monday, gets you up to speed on the latest advances in aerospace.Startups are the core of TechCrunch, so get our best coverage delivered weekly.By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice.© 2024 Yahoo.
